The five criteria

Each service is scored from 0 to 5 on each criterion. The overall rating is the weighted average, and every review page shows the breakdown so you can see where the number came from.

CriterionWeightWhat we assess
Clinical quality30%Is a licensed clinician genuinely evaluating the patient? Does the intake ask about nitrates, cardiac symptoms, current medications and contraindications? Is there a route to ask a follow-up question, adjust a dose, or escalate to in-person care?
Transparency20%Can you see the full price — including the renewal price, not just the introductory offer — before handing over personal data? Is it clear whether the product is an FDA-approved generic or a compounded preparation? Is cancellation described honestly?
Value20%Total monthly cost measured against a benchmark: the same generic bought at a retail pharmacy with a free discount card. Convenience has value, but it should be visible as a premium rather than hidden.
Experience15%Signup friction, clarity of instructions on timing and food, packaging discretion, how easy it is to change dose, and — weighted heavily — how easy it is to cancel.
Privacy15%What health data is collected, how long it is kept, whether it is shared with advertising platforms, and whether the privacy policy is comprehensible. Regulatory action against a service for health-data sharing counts against it.

How we gather the information

  1. We use the service. We complete the intake, note what is asked and what is not, and record the process end to end.
  2. We record the full pricing path — the introductory offer, the renewal price, and what happens when a dose changes.
  3. We check the regulatory basics — whether a licensed clinician is involved, which pharmacy dispenses, and whether it holds relevant accreditation.
  4. We read the privacy policy in full and check for regulatory actions relating to health-data handling.
  5. We test cancellation. This is where services differ most, and it is where the most reader complaints originate.
  6. We benchmark against the non-commercial route — the same generic at a retail pharmacy with a discount card.

What disqualifies a service entirely

Some things are not a scoring deduction. They mean we will not list a service at all, and will not accept a commercial relationship with it.

  • Selling prescription medication without a prescription.
  • No licensed clinician involved in the prescribing decision.
  • Claiming to cure erectile dysfunction, or making unsupported disease claims.
  • Dispensing from a pharmacy that is not licensed in the patient’s state.
  • Marketing supplements as equivalent to prescription treatment.
  • Selling products that appear on the FDA’s tainted products list.
  • Cancellation practices designed to prevent cancellation.

How commercial relationships are kept out of scoring

  • Scores are set before any commercial discussion, and are not revisited because of one.
  • No partner can pay for a rating, a verdict or inclusion. Ranking position can be bought, and is always labelled as such.
  • A “Recommended” label cannot be bought either. It is a separate editorial call from the score and always names the reader it applies to — see what each label means.
  • Non-paying options remain in the line-up and are labelled. Our highest-scoring recommendation currently pays us nothing.
  • Every review states plainly whether the service is a paid partner.
  • If a partner changes in a way that lowers its score, the score goes down.

See how we make money for the full picture.

The limitations of these reviews

Three things we cannot do, stated plainly:

  • We cannot assess clinical outcomes. We can assess process, not whether a particular service made anyone better.
  • Our experience is a sample of one. Intake quality varies by clinician and by state.
  • Pricing moves constantly.Treat every price on this site as an estimate dated to the page’s update date, and verify before buying.

If you have had an experience that contradicts a review, tell us: editorial@edtreatmentguides.com.